tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8820430141970983578.post4178310166095942529..comments2009-08-19T19:21:45.995-05:00Dave Wageshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04031530028833357768noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8820430141970983578.post-24359300285363745432009-08-19T19:21:45.995-05:002009-08-19T19:21:45.995-05:00If I rode a standard level top tube, it would probably be in that range (60-62). <br /><br />As for the 48cm, the rider is 5&#39;2&quot; tall. It&#39;s probably close to the smallest Ellis, but I&#39;ve built much smaller bikes at Waterford and Serotta.Dave Wageshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04031530028833357768noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8820430141970983578.post-57604473626288876332009-08-19T12:49:54.854-05:002009-08-19T12:49:54.854-05:00Ok, Dave, I have to ask: What size bike do you ride? It looks like a 60-62?<br /><br />And related to the prior post, what is the height of the person for whom you are making the 48 cm? Is that the smallest you&#39;ve ever made?gobuckyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11253538811778981017noreply@blogger.com